|
Hier klicken für die
Deutsche Fassung! |
Hot Bodies Cyclone D4
Review, part #2
|
|
|
Gentlemen ... |
|
|
Blazing sunshine from a cloudless sky, with temperatures beyond
30 degrees Celsius and the almost dust-free track of RMC-Vienna:
this is track-test-day no. 1!
|
 |
|
The RMC-Vienna
offers the perfect track for offroad enthusiats The track layout
should be familiar with drivers who participated in the 2006 euros.
The track didn't change since then. |
EQUIPMENT
USED
FOR
TESTING
RC: Sanwa M11 &
RX-211Steering: Sanwa VX
ESC:
Nosram Matrix Evolution
2007 Edition
Motor:
LRP Vector X11 5.5/6.5
Battery:
LRP VTEC 4200 HV² FT |
 |
All external Hyperlinks marked
like this
will be openend in a new browser window!
|
|
|
...
start your engines! |
|
|
I started out calmly, being easy on the throttle as I drove the Cyclone D4
around the track. I wanted to get a feeling for the new racer, and both
slipper and diffs needed some time to break in.
After I had dialed in the ESC, I went straight up to the driver’s stand. The
outcome after the first battery dumped: quite visible enthusiasm in my face!
|
 |
|
 |
| Click on the
pictures to get an enlarged view! |
It was just fun to drive the buggy around the demanding track. The next runs
were dedicated to a photo-shooting to give you an impression of how the Cyclone
D4 looks like on a track.
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Click
on the pictures to get an enlarged view! |
For the rest of the day, I didn’t change anything in the setup department. It
was just that the ESC and motor weren’t yet working to my full satisfaction.
|
|
|
The
second day at the track |
|
|
Just the next day: same weather conditions,
same buggy, same driver, but different track. This time, Hot Bodies Cyclone
D4 had to face MAC
Traiskirchen’s track. Due to the grip level being comparable to the RMC
Vienna track, the D4 performed well with its stock-setup there too, taking the
corners with ease.
But the moment of truth became imminent as I was about to equip the Cyclone D4
with a transponder. This not only meant instant feedback for my setup-work, but
it would also pit the Cyclone D4 against
JConcepts BJ4 Worlds Edition which I drove on the same track earlier
this year.
To be honest, the comparison between these two cars wasn’t completely fair yet,
since the BJ4 was equipped with a front one-way and the Cyclone D4 still had a
front diff.
But the numbers looked promising as I was only 0.3 of a second behind the BJ4’s
best time. Compared to the BJ4 equipped with a front diff too, the Cyclone could
beat it by about 0.4 seconds.
To further fine tune the D4’s performance, I changed to lighter 25wt oil and
relocated the camber links a little. (You can download a setup-sheet towards the
end of this review.) |
|
|
First Race! |
|
|
Towards the end of August, I took the chance to test the Cyclone D4 under
racing conditions. Therefore, the 5th round of the Austrian nationals, held
at the
PSV-Salzburg was the perfect opportunity.
The track was completely new to me, and the participation of many local drivers
with their home field advantage made up a very competitive starting grid.
I started out with my setup from Traiskirchen, still featuring the stock front
diff. Proline’s Holeshot tires were used front and rear, as the OEFMAV
regalement requires.
The less than average grip levels made it difficult to find a working setup for
the track. Solely changing over to a front one-way improved things and made the
D4 more aggressive at the entrance of the turns.
I wasn’t alone with my setup-difficulties. Basically anybody else had to
struggle to keep up with the fierce competition from the local drivers.
So, the reason for my worst performance this year (8th place) was by far not the
car’s fault, rather the extremely challenging track conditions for foreign
drivers.
On a side note: Maintenance work was absolutely easy to do and the Cyclone D4
reacted predictably to the slightest setup changes. The Cyclone D4 showed its
potential and the setup is still workable.
Brushless-excursion:
Brushless motors clearly dominated this year’s
Austrian nationals. 9 out of the top 10 4wd drivers used
brushless systems, mostly from LRP/Nosram. Gone are the
days, were brushless systems were associated with bad
throttle control and reliability, and hardly anyone can
imagine going back to brushed motors.
Gone are the days of tedious motor maintenance,
brushless let’s you focus more on the car and its setup.
My recommendation for the Cyclone D4 would be a
brushless motor with 5.5 to 6.5 turns, depending on the
track layout. |
|
 |
After countless runs, no alarming wear on the Cyclone D4 could be noticed. The
feared diff screw breakage didn’t happen to me, but it loosened up a bit due to
a faulty diff spring. With the spring replaced, and some thread lock on the diff
nut, the diff was as good as new again.
Crash damages were also kept at a minimum: A broken front arm and a partially
fractured shock tower where all, the Cyclone D4 suffered in a head-on collision
at the end of a straight.
To give the track test
a broader approach, I invited another D4 driver, Rene
Levetzow, (overall 6th in the Austrian championships) to
give a few statements on the Cyclone D4’s performance:
-
Handling:
Handling-wise, Hot Bodies Cyclone D4 is very
forgiving. A particular advantage compared to my
former JConcepts BJ4 WE is the D4’s tremendous rear
end grip that comes in handy on slippery tracks.
The best grip balance is achieved with the front
one-way.
-
Durability:
The D4’s durability is good, but there are two
shortcomings:
First, the shock shafts don’t feature an abrasive
resistant coating like Associated or Team Losi shock
shafts.
Second, the hinge pins seem to be made of a soft
material which bends easily on impact.
|
|
|
|
The
final statement |
|
|
After the build, I was very enthusiastic for Hot Bodies'
Cyclone D4 - and at the track, my high expectations were fulfilled. The buggy
leaves nothing to be desired, and with its maintenance-friendly construction,
working on the D4 is very easy.
The car’s handling is very balanced and for me, the kit setup worked
considerably well on most tracks.
Make sure, your pit box doesn’t miss arms, front shock towers and hinge pins!
Special thanks
to:

LRP-Electronic
The author further wants to thank:
-
LRP electornics - who did not only supply the review sample,
but also provided a Vector X11 brushless motor and some nice
batteries
- HOECO – who provided a Nosram Evolution brushless
controller
- Georg Würger – for his perfect airbrush work
- and Aaron Banovics from offroad-CULT, who invited me to
review the Cyclone D4
Written by
Florian Klemm
Translation and pictures by
Aaron Banovics
This article has been published by
www.offroad-cult.org
on 9-9-2007.
Aktuelle Testberichte von offroad-CULT:
| |
|
Einer für
alle! GM-Racings Genius-Controller können Bürstenmotoren
und bürstenlose Motoren mit und ohne Sensorunterstützung
ansteuern. Was der hier gezeigte Genius 85 sonst noch
so zu bieten hat,
deckt unser Testbericht auf! |
|
|
Was
kann man von einem Modell zwischen Einsteigerbuggy und
High-End Offroadmaschine erwarten? Wie schlägt sich
Tamiyas neuer Durga DB01 im Vergleich zur Kyosho und
Academy-Konkurrenz?
Unser Testbericht klärt's! |
|
|
Team Orion Carbon Edition 3600 Race Spec: Team
Orions zur Zeit schärfster Hardcase-Lipo -
auf dem Prüfstand!
INTERNATIONAL RELEASE available
here! |
|
|
Kyoshos Lazer ZX-5 Readyset
ist eine preisgünstige Alternative zum Lazer ZX-5. Das
RTR-Modell nimmt mit einem UVP von 269 Euro einen Platz
in der sonst recht leeren Mittelklasse ein.
Geht der Wunsch vom
ambitionierten, leistbaren 4wd Rennbuggy für den
Hobbyfahrer damit in Erfüllung... ? |
|
|
Team Losis CR-Generation im Test,
Teil 2: Auch der Stadium-Truck ist seit
Kurzem als "CR"-Version erhältlich. Grund genug, den
XXX-T cr zum offroad-CULT Härtetest vorzuladen
und ihn auf Herz und Nieren durch
zu checken! |
|
|
Team Losis CR-Generation im Test,
Teil 1:
Im ersten
Teil dieses Doppel-Tests
lädt Losis XXX-cr zur Testfahrt ein. Fast 8 Jahre
XXX-Plattform: Was hat sich geändert? Was wurde
verbessert? Und was bringt's unterm Strich für den
Fahrer? Hier geht's weiter zu unserem
Testbericht! |
|
|
Wettbewerbsbuggy goes RTR:
Thunder Tiger bringt das bisherige Flaggschiff-Modell,
den EB4 S3 in RTR-Neuauflage auf den Markt.
Was die RTR Ausstattung taugt und
welche Figur der EB4 S3 RTR in der Praxis macht,
klärt unser 58-seitiger Exklusiv
Testbericht! |
|
|
Hot Bodies neuer Allrad Racer:
Mittelmotor, zweiteiliger Kardanantrieb mit
Kegelrad-Getriebeboxen und Saddlepacks - so sieht das
aktuelle 4wd Design-Dogma aus. Der Cyclone D4 setzt
dieses auch kompromisslos um,
doch wie macht er sich auf der
Rennstrecke?
INTERNATIONAL RELEASE available
here! |
|
|
Stadium-Action zum Zweiten! Diesmal nehmen wir uns
den Firestorm 10T von HPI Racing vor. Mit einer
sympathischen Chassiskonstruktion und einem starken
3,0ccm Motor scheint er gute Karten zu haben -
aber reicht das für den
offroad-CULT Härtetest?
INTERNATIONAL RELEASE soon
available! |
|
|
Offroad-Einstieg um weniger als 150 Euro - ein guter
Deal? Ist da nicht irgendwo ein Haken? Und überhaupt: Wie gut ist
Ansmann Racings Smacker wirklich?
Der Budget-Buggy im offroad-CULT
Test! |
|
|
Reely / XTM-Racing X-Cellerator: Stadium Action zum
Sonderpreis!
Ob sich der Stadium Truck lohnt, der hierzulande von
Conrad Electronic vertrieben wird, stellen wir in
unserem
Testbericht fest!
INTERNATIONAL RELEASE
available
here! |
|
|
Der Truggy im Kleinformat: Nach dem "Shark 18" 4wd
Elektrobuggy im Maßstab 1:18 präsentiert uns LRP nun die
Truggy-Version als
Shark 18 Monster.
Wir haben die RTR-Version
ausführlich getestet!
INTERNATIONAL RELEASE
available
here! |
|
|
Truggies liegen voll im Trend - klar dass Kyosho als
eine der ganz großen Marken am 1/8 Offroad-Sektor dabei
ist. Mit dem
Inferno ST US Sports
sollen vor allem Einsteiger angesprochen werden -
auch wir haben uns angesprochen
gefühlt!
INTERNATIONAL RELEASE
available
here! |
|
|
Keep it
small and simple - dass "Monstertruck" nicht
gleichzeitig "Monstermäßig" kompliziert bedeuten muss,
will Jamara mit der
Track-Sau vorzeigen
und sie uns als erstklassiges Bashgerät präsentieren.
Wahrheit oder Marketing-Gag? -
unser Testbericht klärt's! |
|
|
Der
Robitronic
Protos ist ein 1/8 Verbrennerbuggy der
Einsteigerklasse: um 400 Euro (UVP des Herstellers)
bekommt man einen Buggy komplett mit Fernsteuerung,
Motor und Verbrennerzubehör. Wozu der Protos taugt,
klären wir in unserem
24-seitigem Testbericht. |
noch mehr Testberichte ...
|
|
|